βBack to feed
π§ AIπ’ BullishImportance 6/10
Human-in-the-Loop LLM Grading for Handwritten Mathematics Assessments
arXiv β CS AI|Arne Vanhoyweghen, Vincent Holst, Melika Mobini, Lukas Van de Voorde, Tibo Vanleke, Bert Verbruggen, Brecht Verbeken, Andres Algaba, Sam Verboven, Marie-Anne Guerry, Filip Van Droogenbroeck, Vincent Ginis|
π€AI Summary
Researchers developed a human-in-the-loop LLM system for grading handwritten mathematics assessments that reduces grading time by 23% while maintaining accuracy comparable to manual grading. The system combines automated scanning, multi-pass LLM scoring, consistency checks, and mandatory human verification to handle pen-and-paper tests at scale.
Key Takeaways
- βLLM-assisted grading reduces teacher workload by approximately 23% compared to fully manual grading.
- βThe system maintains grading accuracy and fairness comparable to traditional manual methods through human oversight.
- βThe workflow addresses the growing need for supervised in-class assessments as AI undermines take-home testing reliability.
- βHuman verification and consistency checks effectively contain occasional LLM errors in the hybrid design.
- βThe system was successfully deployed across six low-stakes mathematics tests in undergraduate courses.
#llm#education-ai#human-in-the-loop#automated-grading#mathematics#assessment#workflow-automation#ai-assisted-education
Read Original βvia arXiv β CS AI
Act on this with AI
Stay ahead of the market.
Connect your wallet to an AI agent. It reads balances, proposes swaps and bridges across 15 chains β you keep full control of your keys.
Related Articles